<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin&#8217;s Downward Momentum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craigorndorff.com/2009/04/24/palins-downward-momentum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craigorndorff.com/2009/04/24/palins-downward-momentum/</link>
	<description>The poor man&#039;s George F. Wll and the Econoline Victor Davis Hansen for the Shenandoah Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Orndorff</title>
		<link>http://craigorndorff.com/2009/04/24/palins-downward-momentum/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Orndorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigorndorff.com/?p=996#comment-303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven,

Thanks for the tip--I didn&#039;t realize that Palin was trending upward in the PPP survey (why I didn&#039;t recall that PPP is a Dem firm puzzles me). Perhaps downward was the wrong word--as you mentioned on your blog, Palin definitely had a good night in Indianapolis two weeks ago. What I&#039;m watching, though, is whether Palin can expand beyond her conservative base. I&#039;m afraid the media has done a pretty good sell job on her at this point, and unfortunately, for all her great work as a conservative leader, she&#039;s been suffering from some PR and political missteps of late. 

I think we really haven&#039;t started to see too much movement from Obama on head to head matchups, and it probably isn&#039;t healthy (from a political or mental health perspective) to taking too much from these numbers this far out. I would also caution putting too much into her favorability ratings--recall that even Senator McCain had favorability in the mid-50s to low-60s throughout most of the general election, bottoming out around fifty just as we were headed to the polls. 

Again, though, four years is a lifetime in politics. Let&#039;s see what Sarah&#039;s made of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip&#8211;I didn&#8217;t realize that Palin was trending upward in the PPP survey (why I didn&#8217;t recall that PPP is a Dem firm puzzles me). Perhaps downward was the wrong word&#8211;as you mentioned on your blog, Palin definitely had a good night in Indianapolis two weeks ago. What I&#8217;m watching, though, is whether Palin can expand beyond her conservative base. I&#8217;m afraid the media has done a pretty good sell job on her at this point, and unfortunately, for all her great work as a conservative leader, she&#8217;s been suffering from some PR and political missteps of late. </p>
<p>I think we really haven&#8217;t started to see too much movement from Obama on head to head matchups, and it probably isn&#8217;t healthy (from a political or mental health perspective) to taking too much from these numbers this far out. I would also caution putting too much into her favorability ratings&#8211;recall that even Senator McCain had favorability in the mid-50s to low-60s throughout most of the general election, bottoming out around fifty just as we were headed to the polls. </p>
<p>Again, though, four years is a lifetime in politics. Let&#8217;s see what Sarah&#8217;s made of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Osborne</title>
		<link>http://craigorndorff.com/2009/04/24/palins-downward-momentum/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Osborne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigorndorff.com/?p=996#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig,

I would encourage you to check out the crosstabs on that PPP poll. Nearly half of the people polled were Democrats(40%). The poll assumes that Democratic turnout will be higher in 2012 than it was in 2008. 

Even with it&#039;s scewed methodology, the PPP poll shows Sarah Palin increasing by 6% and Obama losing 2% from the last PPP Obama v. Palin matchup. That is hardly downward momentum.

I would look to Rasmussen(the most accurate poll in 2008), that has Sarah Palin at 52% favorability nationally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,</p>
<p>I would encourage you to check out the crosstabs on that PPP poll. Nearly half of the people polled were Democrats(40%). The poll assumes that Democratic turnout will be higher in 2012 than it was in 2008. </p>
<p>Even with it&#8217;s scewed methodology, the PPP poll shows Sarah Palin increasing by 6% and Obama losing 2% from the last PPP Obama v. Palin matchup. That is hardly downward momentum.</p>
<p>I would look to Rasmussen(the most accurate poll in 2008), that has Sarah Palin at 52% favorability nationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

